Timeline for Full node vs permanode
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 19, 2017 at 13:15 | comment | added | Daniel F | Please don't accept it, if it doesn't answer your question. | |
Dec 19, 2017 at 13:14 | comment | added | user3223162 | I have accepted your answer, even though the incentive questions remain unanswered. It might be a good idea to edit my question not to include these issues and ask a separate question. | |
Dec 19, 2017 at 13:13 | comment | added | Daniel F | Then there are also swarm nodes, which contain only a segment of the tangle. | |
Dec 19, 2017 at 13:08 | vote | accept | user3223162 | ||
Dec 19, 2017 at 13:16 | |||||
Dec 19, 2017 at 13:06 | comment | added | Daniel F | That was an answer on full nodes. Full nodes only contain the full tangle from the moment a snapshot was made to the present. Permanodes contain no snapshots, they have all tx ever made. | |
Dec 19, 2017 at 12:56 | comment | added | user3223162 | Very precise answer on permanodes, but could you comment more about the transactions that full nodes see, do they see the entire tangle or just a shard? | |
Dec 19, 2017 at 12:43 | comment | added | Daniel F | This is a snapshot raw.githubusercontent.com/iotaledger/iri/dev/src/main/resources/… | |
Dec 19, 2017 at 12:40 | comment | added | Daniel F | The snapshot contains all addresses that have balances on them and their balances, everything else is erased, so the Tangle builds up newly from there on. You have no history, don't know how those balances ended up in that address. Permanodes have that history. | |
Dec 19, 2017 at 9:10 | comment | added | user3223162 | To paraphrase, full node contains all the transactions before a snapshot, not just the transactions that reached the node before a snapshot | |
Dec 18, 2017 at 17:03 | history | edited | Daniel F | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 570 characters in body
|
Dec 18, 2017 at 16:53 | history | answered | Daniel F | CC BY-SA 3.0 |