Timeline for Adress reuse with zero value transactions
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2018 at 20:14 | comment | added | mike | Okay, I've been using it wrong then. But I have no need for a to address, since I use tags for message relaying. So I guess, I can leave it like that :D Thank you! | |
| Sep 12, 2018 at 20:08 | comment | added | mihi♦ | The corresponding bundle shows it as an output address :) | |
| Sep 12, 2018 at 19:04 | comment | added | mike | Oh, there is only one address!? Maybe I'm misusing the to address as from address. Here's a transaction. | |
| Sep 12, 2018 at 18:52 | comment | added | mihi♦ | it depends on what libs you are using. When you are using devnet, can you post a transaction hash or link to devnet.thetangle.org? I'm curious where your library is hiding the "from" address and "to" address in a transaction that only has one address field :) | |
| Sep 12, 2018 at 8:22 | vote | accept | mike | ||
| Sep 12, 2018 at 8:22 | comment | added | mike | @mihi They don't need a from. But at least in devnet it's posible to set a from address. The application I'm developing kind of relies on the fact that the entity messaging is also the one paying later on. | |
| Sep 11, 2018 at 19:58 | comment | added | mihi♦ | zero value transactions do not have a from | |
| Sep 11, 2018 at 15:02 | answer | added | ben75 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 11, 2018 at 13:11 | comment | added | mike | In my opinion it should be, since the the zero value transaction don't get signed. | |
| Sep 11, 2018 at 13:10 | history | asked | mike | CC BY-SA 4.0 |