Skip to main content
deleted 3 characters in body
Source Link
Helmar
  • 1.3k
  • 1
  • 15
  • 28

The kk from the footnote of section 1 is the required number of transactions to be referenced by new transactions (as is noted by you in your question).

The kk from section 3 is just an index/placeholder in the context of number of tips overall (not the number of tips to be referenced), and one could have used any letter here. 

For example,
The limit of P[L(t) = m] as t → ∞ should exist and be positive for all m ≥1
conveysThe limit of P[L(t) = m] as t → ∞ should exist and be positive for all m ≥1 conveys the same meaning.

The k from the footnote of section 1 is the required number of transactions to be referenced by new transactions (as is noted by you in your question).

The k from section 3 is just an index/placeholder in the context of number of tips overall (not the number of tips to be referenced), and one could have used any letter here. For example,
The limit of P[L(t) = m] as t → ∞ should exist and be positive for all m ≥1
conveys the same meaning.

The k from the footnote of section 1 is the required number of transactions to be referenced by new transactions (as is noted by you in your question).

The k from section 3 is just an index/placeholder in the context of number of tips overall (not the number of tips to be referenced), and one could have used any letter here. 

For example, The limit of P[L(t) = m] as t → ∞ should exist and be positive for all m ≥1 conveys the same meaning.

Source Link
Phil-ZXX
  • 1.7k
  • 1
  • 12
  • 17

The k from the footnote of section 1 is the required number of transactions to be referenced by new transactions (as is noted by you in your question).

The k from section 3 is just an index/placeholder in the context of number of tips overall (not the number of tips to be referenced), and one could have used any letter here. For example,
The limit of P[L(t) = m] as t → ∞ should exist and be positive for all m ≥1
conveys the same meaning.