Timeline for How does Curl-P's copy protection feature work?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2019 at 18:31 | vote | accept | todofixthis | ||
| Oct 21, 2019 at 16:29 | comment | added | Ethan Heilman | Was the '13' or 'M" attack also part of the copy protection? | |
| Aug 11, 2018 at 7:26 | comment | added | Come-from-Beyond | @AustinPowers Are you sure you don't mix open-source software and free software? Take a look at gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.en.html. | |
| Aug 9, 2018 at 14:59 | comment | added | Zauz | There are various reasons for making software Open Source. Iota's reason was not "Here's the source code, feel free to copy it and make your own ICO" but rather reasons like "Here's the source code, we won't steal your money", "Here's the source code, feel free to improve it", etc. Why GNU GPL was chosen over others, I don't know. Maybe interesting new question? | |
| Aug 9, 2018 at 14:59 | comment | added | Zauz | Company A invests 90$ in development and 10$ in marketing, Company B invests 10$ in development (= copying and refactoring stolen code from Company A) and 90$ in marketing. Company B is more successful. Developers (CFB in particular, I think) didn't want this to happen to Iota. | |
| Aug 9, 2018 at 12:38 | comment | added | Zauz | @AustinPowers It's answered in section "CfB's idea of copy protection". What's missing? | |
| Jan 8, 2018 at 23:29 | history | edited | Lanu Moe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 100 characters in body
|
| Jan 8, 2018 at 20:55 | history | answered | Lanu Moe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |