Timeline for Why were hash collisions unimportant?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2018 at 23:21 | comment | added | Lanu Moe | As answer to a different question, I just explained the impact of Curl-P hash collisions and how it differs with and without coordinator. This pretty much answers your main question, too. | |
| Jan 8, 2018 at 20:07 | comment | added | cmpn | The input signatures are stored in the bundle of a transaction. The tx hash is the computed result hash of all this data together. | |
| Jan 8, 2018 at 15:21 | comment | added | Matt Crouch | edited to say signing - but doesn't the signature use the txn hash? or am I mistaken? am I mixing terms? | |
| Jan 8, 2018 at 15:20 | history | edited | Matt Crouch | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 12 characters in body
|
| Jan 8, 2018 at 15:00 | comment | added | cmpn | Curl-P is still used for transaction hashing but not for input signing. | |
| Jan 8, 2018 at 14:06 | history | edited | Matt Crouch | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Jan 8, 2018 at 13:44 | answer | added | ben75 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 8, 2018 at 13:27 | history | edited | Matt Crouch | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 10 characters in body
|
| Jan 8, 2018 at 13:17 | history | edited | Matt Crouch | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Jan 8, 2018 at 13:11 | history | edited | Matt Crouch | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
| Jan 8, 2018 at 13:08 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 8, 2018 at 14:13 | |||||
| Jan 8, 2018 at 13:03 | history | asked | Matt Crouch | CC BY-SA 3.0 |