# When is it required to initiate an intentional partitioning of the Tangle?

### Offline Subtangles

If two parties are disconnected from the internet (no connection to main Tangle) temporarily and still want to send Iotas to each other, they could do that in an offline subtangle. Further explanation can be found here:

* https://iota.stackexchange.com/q/318/10
* https://iota.stackexchange.com/q/275/10  
* https://iota.stackexchange.com/q/1523/10  
* https://iota.stackexchange.com/q/1513/10

### Economic Clustering

In the future, it would be _overkill_, if every node would process all transactions. If we have millions of transactions, it would even be physically _difficult_, probably impossible for every node to to process all transactions. These clusters would almost act like different cryptocurrencies, but they would follow they almost the same (or exactly the same) rules and could be merged or at least synchronized if needed.  
This sounds like an inconvenient solution  and I'm not denying that it is, but you can't argue with physics. And to be honest, the coffeemaker in China doesn't have to know that the drone in South Africa just got paid for delivering a package.

Since it's not necessary to do economic clustering now, everything about the topic is very experimental. Maybe we find a different solution to the problems that is not at all similar to my description. But this is how it could work.

Also: [Article on EC by CFB][1]

---

There are probably more reasons that no one thought of yet. Point is: Partition tolerance is a useful and necessary feature of the Tangle.

## How can the Tangle be both resistant to partitioning and ...

see [comment](https://iota.stackexchange.com/questions/1973/when-would-it-be-required-to-intentionally-partition-the-iota-transaction-graph#comment2522_1973)

  [1]: https://medium.com/@comefrombeyond/economic-clustering-and-iota-d3a77388900