Iota Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of Iota, the open-source cryptocurrency for IoT that does not use a blockchain. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
I want to sort transactions, within a specific tag, in temporal order. In the docs it says:
timestamp:Inttimestamp of the transaction. It is important to know that timestamps in IOTA are not enforced.
Is there a convention regarding the time zones to be used? And what's about attachmentTimestamp? On which of the time-related fields, timestamp or attachmentTimestamp, should I relay?
Timestamps in transactions are expected to be unix timestamps. Unix timestamps are timezone independent.
Most importantly, timestamps are set by the client (i.e. the sender) and nothing in the protocol guarantees that they are correct. So relying on timestamp/attachmentTimestamp to re-order the transactions is probably not the best option (unless you have complete control of the client).
If you need ordered messages, you can look at Masked Authenticated Messaging (MAM) were in addition to strict message ordering you also have (optional) encryption of the data.
