3

I'm trying to craft an example going through the math equation in Section 4.1 . I'm trying to show my work. Can you tell me if I've got it right and if not, help correct me?

4.1 Equation
Hx – Cumulative weight at node x – Let’s say 65
Hy – Cumulative weight at node y – Let’s say 70
Hz – Cumulative weight at node z – Let’s say 75
α – Try with 1
Pxy = exp( -1( 65 – 70 ) * ((75+74+…65)^(-1(65 – 75)) )^-1
Pxy = exp( 5) * (770^10))^-1
Pxy = 1.365e-29^5
Pxy = 4.737e-145

1 Answer 1

1

Unfortunately, this doesn't look correct. Regardless of the actual numbers, you are not treating the sum as a sum but rather as a single summand. On top of that, you seem to be missing the exp function in a few places during your P_xy calculation.

Below I am pasting a sample calculation for a transaction x that is referenced by three other transactions y_1,y_2,y_3. That is, y_i⇝x for i=1,2,3.

So for example, the transition probability of going from x to y_3 is ≈ 32%.

SampleCalc

10
  • Am I not iterating over y as well? To go from z to x I have to pass through y (75, 74, 73, 72, 72, 71, 70!!!,..) Are you saying this Sigma is not Sigma notation? home.windstream.net/okrebs/page136.html
    – Bill Bisco
    Jan 16, 2018 at 14:30
  • Is the math supposed to be 75^( -1(65 - 75) + 74^(-1(65 - 75) .... ?
    – Bill Bisco
    Jan 16, 2018 at 14:32
  • I mean, generally, there are several issues. For one, the cum weight of x should be larger than the one of y. Secondly, neither ((75+74+…65)^(-1(65 – 75)))^-1 nor 75^( -1(65 - 75) + 74^(-1(65 - 75) has the exp function in it, so I am really not sure what you are calculating.
    – Phil-ZXX
    Jan 16, 2018 at 15:28
  • The whitepaper says put random particles on sites on the tangle and have them walk towards the target. The walkers are defined as y approves x so so site x is somewhere earlier in the tangle and site y is a tip at the end? The tip should have a larger weight than a previous transaction earlier no? x should smaller than y no?
    – Bill Bisco
    Jan 16, 2018 at 16:31
  • 6exp( 3 ) is the same as 6^3 or 6*6*6 or 216 no? In my comment above I said z is 75 and I start the sigma with 75 that should be 75 ^ ( -1 ( 65 - 75) and then I add that to the next right 74 ^ (-1 (65 - 75) ?
    – Bill Bisco
    Jan 16, 2018 at 16:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.