Timeline for Full node vs permanode
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2022 at 8:26 | answer | added | xbfSiiedler | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 30, 2018 at 8:38 | vote | accept | user3223162 | ||
| Jan 9, 2018 at 9:47 | answer | added | user3223162 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 5, 2018 at 9:36 | history | edited | Helmar | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Removed superfluous tags
|
| Dec 19, 2017 at 13:08 | vote | accept | user3223162 | ||
| Dec 19, 2017 at 13:16 | |||||
| Dec 18, 2017 at 16:53 | answer | added | Daniel F | timeline score: 6 | |
| Dec 18, 2017 at 14:19 | history | edited | user3223162 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 102 characters in body
|
| Dec 18, 2017 at 14:05 | history | edited | user3223162 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 44 characters in body
|
| Dec 18, 2017 at 14:04 | comment | added | user3223162 | Thank you for your response. More than asking questions, I was trying to make statements that are either right or wrong and state clear differences between nodes. Could you comment on those? (I will edit my question to be more precise) Furthermore, I have never asked why would anyone run a full node without financial incentive, I was asking the question about the permanode. | |
| Dec 18, 2017 at 14:00 | comment | added | Helmar | Trust the ultimate problem of every cryptographic technology. The trust issue is not confined to permanodes it applies to the full nodes as well. Regarding your first question, why would anyone run a full node without financial incentive? Both your questions do not target any difference between the nodes. Which makes your question a bit unclear to be honest, since the questions in the description don't match either title nor introduction. | |
| Dec 18, 2017 at 13:23 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 18, 2017 at 14:00 | |||||
| Dec 18, 2017 at 13:19 | history | asked | user3223162 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |